Professor Chisholm on supererogation and offence

Philosophical Studies 18 (6):87 - 94 (1967)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00365994
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation?Gregory Mellema - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Professor Chisholm and the Criterion.Michael Corrado - 1978 - Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (2):55-57.
Professor Chisholm and the Problem of the Speckled Hen.Ralph Kennedy - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:143-147.
Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory.David Heyd - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Professor Chisholm on Perceiving.Charles A. Baylis - 1959 - Journal of Philosophy 56 (September):773-790.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
31 ( #169,824 of 2,191,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature