Part IX of Hume's dialogues

Philosophical Quarterly 28 (113):300-309 (1978)
In part ix of "dialogues concerning natural religion", Demea advances an "a priori" argument for the existence of god: an argument of which cleanthes and philo then make a number of trenchant criticisms. These criticisms are acknowledged by all commentators to be hume's own, And they are regarded by almost all commentators as being fatal to demea's argument. I show that, On the contrary, Hume's main criticisms are all worthless, And that they even include an inconsistency of the most glaring kind
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2219082
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,812
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
177 ( #29,846 of 2,231,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #120,178 of 2,231,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature