Science and Two Kinds of Knowledge: Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and the Ignorabimus-Streit

Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (3):519-549 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper offers a new interpretation of Nietzsche’s conception of scientific explanation that promises to resolve the apparent tension between his insistence on the veracity of such explanations, and his frequent attempts to impugn their cognitive reach. Nietzsche follows earlier nineteenth-century critiques of science in claiming that science yields only factual or “descriptive” knowledge, not understanding. The paper concludes that the conception of descriptive knowledge is robust and compatible with Nietzsche’s commitment to the truth and rigor of scientific theories. The interpretation also sheds new light on Nietzsche’s oft-voiced claims that certain concepts “falsify” the world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Metafísica da Música de Arthur Schopenhauer.Henry Burnett - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (2):143-162.
Nietzsche's Thinking in Relationship with the Aesthetical.Stefan Maftei - 2003 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (4):26-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-13

Downloads
83 (#198,631)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Stoll
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references