The conceivability argument and two conceptions of the physical

Philosophical Perspectives 15:393-413 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The conceivability argument against physicalism1 starts from the prem- ises that: It is conceivable that I have a zombie-twin, i.e., that there is someone who is physically identical to me and yet who lacks phenomenal con- sciousness; and If it is conceivable that I have a zombie-twin, then it is possible that I have a zombie-twin. These premises entail that physicalism is false, for physicalism is the claim—or can be assumed for our purposes to be the claim2—that

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Access denied to zombies.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Unpublished (1):1-13.
Conceiving what is not there.Andrew Botterell - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (8):21-42.
Physicalism unfalsified: Chalmers' inconclusive argument for dualism.Andrew Melnyk - 2001 - In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press. pp. 331-349.
Can the Conditional Analysis Strategy Help Physicalism?Woojin Han - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (1-2):110-126.
The inconceivability of zombies.Robert Kirk - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (1):73-89.
Conceivability, possibility, and the mind-body problem.Katalin Balog - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (4):497-528.
Redundancy of the Zombie Argument in The Conscious Mind.Antti Heikinheimo - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (5-6):5-6.
A priori physicalism, lonely ghosts and cartesian doubt.Philip Goff - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):742-746.
Loar's defence of physicalism.Stephen Law - 2004 - Ratio 17 (1):60-67.
The anti-zombie argument.Keith Frankish - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):650–666.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
331 (#58,703)

6 months
27 (#107,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Stoljar
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Representation in Cognitive Science.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism.David Chalmers - 2013 - Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 8.
Physicalism.Daniel Stoljar - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Russellian Physicalism and its Dilemma.Lok-Chi Chan - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178:2043-2062.
Zombies.Robert Kirk - 2003 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references