Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):239-263 (2003)
Jon Elster denies that collectives can behave rationally. Rational behavior requires action in conformity with preferences and beliefs. According to Elster, however, social choice theory demonstrates that collectives cannot have preferences, even in principle, and this precludes them from behaving either rationally or irrationally. (Irrationality, after all, is a property that can only be possessed by something that could in theory be rational.) Elster, however, does not fully accept this refutation of the possibility of collective rationality. For in exploring the question of random selection, he argues that collectives, as well as individuals, can employ random selection as a tool to facilitate more rational behavior. This contradiction can be resolved if collective preferences are not as inconceivable as Elster suggests, and Elster himself gives reason for believing they may not be. He does this by distinguishing between a thin and a broad theory of rationality. His refutation of the possibility of collective preferences depends on a thin theory of preferences (and beliefs), a theory that he admits is inadequate for purposes of normative assessment. A broad theory of preferences and beliefs, when properly developed, could well accommodate the notion of collective preferences and beliefs, and thus of collective rationality. Key Words: Elster rationality social choice theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme.
Rational Responsibility for Preferences and Moral Responsibility for Character Traits.Donald W. Bruckner - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:191-209.
Collective Preferences, Obligations, and Rational Choice.Margaret P. Gilbert - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):109-119.
A Preference for Selfish Preferences: The Problem of Motivations in Rational Choice Political Science.Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):361-378.
Where Do Preferences Come From?Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - International Journal of Game Theory 42 (3):613-637.
Can Norms Rescue Self‐Interest or Macro Explanation Be Joined to Micro Explanation?Aaron Wildavsky - 1991 - Critical Review 5 (3):301-323.
Autonomy, Adaptation, and Rationality a Critical Discussion of Jon Elster's Concept of "Sour Grapes".Tore Sandven - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (1):3-31.
Autonomy, Adaptation, and Rationality-a Critical Discussion of Jon Elster's Concept of "Sour Grapes," Part II.Tore Sandven - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):173-205.
Rational Choice Theory Considered as Psychology and Moral Philosophy.Philippe Mongin - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (1):5-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #143,623 of 2,171,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?