British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39 (2001)
This paper reviews the validity of National Curriculum assessment in England. It works with the concept of 'consequential validity' (Messick, 1989) which incorporates both conventional 'reliability' issues and the use to which any assessment is put. The review uses the eight stage 'threats to validity' model developed by Crooks, Kane and Cohen (1996). The complexity of National Curriculum assessment makes evaluation difficult. These assessments are used for a variety of purposes so that the 'consequential' aspects are compounded. National Curriculum assessment also involves both Teacher Assessment and tests - each of which has strengths and limitations in relation to validity. The main finding is that the validity of National Curriculum assessment hinges on the balance between Teacher Assessment and testing. Between them they can meet Crooks et al.'s requirements of a valid assessment system. The current emphasis on the use of test results for school accountability and as a measure of national standards has undermined Teacher Assessment to a point at which the validity of the system is in question.
|Keywords||assessment validity National Curriculum|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Criterion Referencing and the Meaning of National Curriculum Assessment.Steve Sizmur & Marian Sainsbury - 1997 - British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (2):123 - 140.
A Model for Feed-Forward Assessment of Student Learning in Industry-Issues Courses.Kelly C. Strong & Rhonda Wiley Jones - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:379-380.
The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMaRT): A Valid and Reliable Assessment for Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State Patients.H. Gill-Thwaites & R. Munday - 2004 - Brain Injury 18 (12):1255-1269.
Pedagogic Thinking That Grounds E-Learning for Secondary School Science Students in New Zealand.Robert Keith Shaw - 2007 - E-Learning and Digital Media 4 (4):471-481.
Moral Education Through the 3 Rs: Rights, Respect and Responsibility.Katherine Covell & R. Brian Howe - 2001 - Journal of Moral Education 30 (1):29-41.
Assessment: Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections.Maddalena Taras - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):466 - 478.
How Theory Matters: Formative Assessment Theory and Practices and Their Different Relations to Education. [REVIEW]Barbara Crossouard & John Pryor - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (3):251-263.
The Formative Use of Assessment Information in Planning: The Notion of Contingent Planning.John Threlfall - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (1):54 - 65.
The Politics and Practicalities of Curriculum Change 1991-2000: Issues Arising From a Study of School Geography in England. [REVIEW]Eleanor M. Rawling - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (2):137 - 158.
Moral Development: Whose Ethics in the Teaching of Religious Education?Andrew Bolton - 1997 - Journal of Moral Education 26 (2):197-210.
Repeat Prescription: The National Curriculum for Initial Teacher Training.David Hartley - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (1):68 - 83.
An Electronic Learning Community Partnership Uses Case Studies to Enhance Diversity.Debra Baird-Wilson - 2005 - Inquiry 24 (3):33-36.
Strengthening Morality and Ethics in Educational Assessment Through Ubuntu in South Africa.Peter A. D. Beets - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s2):68-83.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads15 ( #303,110 of 2,146,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.