Philosophical Studies 173 (2):289-307 (2016)

Authors
Jada Twedt Strabbing
Wayne State University
Abstract
A common objection to particular views of attributability is that they fail to account for weakness of will. In this paper, I show that the problem of weakness of will is much deeper than has been recognized, extending to all views of attributability on offer because of the general form that these views take. The fundamental problem is this: current views claim that being attributionally responsible is a matter of exercising whatever capacity that they take to be relevant to attributability; however, weakness of will cases show that we can be attributionally responsible for actions that result from failing to exercise that capacity. I propose a novel solution that any view of attributability can and must take on board in order to be viable. The solution is to recognize that being attributionally responsible is not fundamentally a matter of exercising the attributability-relevant capacity but is rather a matter of having that capacity, so long as that capacity figures in the explanation of the action
Keywords Attributability  Moral responsibility  Weakness of will  Capacity
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-015-0491-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Accountability and the Thoughts in Reactive Attitudes.Jada Strabbing - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (12):3121-3140.
What is the Difference Between Weakness of Will and Compulsion?August Gorman - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsibility as Answerability.Angela M. Smith - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (2):99-126.
The Physiognomy of Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):381-417.
Aquinas and Weakness of Will.Bonnie Kent - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):70–91.
Coercion and Moral Blameworthiness.Lloyd Fields - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):135-151.
Dismantling Desert.Lindsay Kelland - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):124-133.
Technological Progress and Responsibility.Nikil Mukerji - 2014 - In Fiorella Battaglia, Nikil Mukerji & Julian Nida-Rümelin (eds.), Rethinking Responsibility in Science and Technology. Pisa University Press. pp. 25-36.
Responsibility: Distinguishing Virtue From Capacity.Nicole A. Vincent - 2009 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):111-26.
Weakness of Will.Karin Rosemarie Jasper - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Weakness of Will: A Conflict Between Evaluation and Motivation.Jih-Ching Ho - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-25

Total views
301 ( #32,339 of 2,461,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #56,134 of 2,461,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes