Radical Philosophy Today 2006:3-25 (2006)
Just war theory distinguishes between jus ad bellum (whether the war itself is just) and jus in bello (whether the conduct of the war is just). I argue, against the traditional view, that modern warfare has made it impossible to separate the two in practice. Specifically, I argue that modern war is a techno-cultural system which requires its participants to violate the primary criterion of jus in bello—noncombatant immunity. From this it follows that even a war of self-defense is not a just war. I consider several challenges to my position: the doctrine of double effect and the claim that noncombatant immunity can be suspended on the basis of military necessity or supreme emergency. I argue that neither of these challenges is acceptable and that to suspend the rule of noncombatant immunity is to suspend the moral point of view. Finally, I consider alternatives which would change the techno-cultural system of modern war
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Social and Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Proportionality, Just War Theory, and America's 2003–2004 War Against Iraq.Joseph Betz - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:137-156.
An Introduction to Military Ethics: A Reference Handbook.Bill Rhodes - 2009 - Praeger.
The Ethics of War in Asian Civilizations: A Comparative Perspective.Torkel Brekke (ed.) - 2006 - Routledge.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
The Just War Tradition and its Modern Legacy: Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello.D. Boucher - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):92-111.
Just War, Noncombatant Immunity, and the Concept of Supreme Emergency.David K. Chan - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):273-286.
The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Defining War for the 21st Century.Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) - 2011 - Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Nonlethal Weapons, Noncombatant Immunity, and Combatant Nonimmunity: A Study of Just War Theory. [REVIEW]John W. Lango - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):475-497.
The War Convention and the Moral Division of Labour.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):593-617.
Nonlethal Weapons and Noncombatant Immunity: Is It Permissible to Target Noncombatants?Chris Mayer - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (3):221-231.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads22 ( #228,644 of 2,172,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?