Deconstructing the Models of Judges: Legal Hermeneutics and Beyond the Subject-Object Paradigm

Abstract

The linguistic-ontological turn has brought uncountable consequences to the interpretation of Law. However, dogmatic-legal knowledge remains hostage to a judicial protagonism, a philosophy of consciousness that, together with legal discretion, represent two sides of the same coin. The criticism of judicial discretion is a matter of democracy: decisions must be coherent, assuring the integrity of Law by reinforcing the normative power of the Constitution from which arises the need for correct answers in Law

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Understanding judicial discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.
Strategies of judicial review. Exercising judicial discretion in administrative cases involving business entities.Marcin Matczak & Denis Galligan - 2005 - E&Y Better Government Programme.
Judicial Practical Reason: Judges in Morally Imperfect Legal Orders.Anthony R. Reeves - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):319-352.
Judicial discretion and the concept of law.K. Himma - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1):71-82.
Original sin and judicial independence.Paul D. Carrington - manuscript
A Time as the Basis of the New Paradigm of Responsibility.Marina Solodkaya - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1011-1018.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Ontologies of professional legal knowledge as the basis for intelligent IT support for judges.V. R. Benjamins, J. Contreras, P. Casanovas, M. Ayuso, M. Becue, L. Lemus & C. Urios - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):359-378.
Limits of legality: the ethics of lawless judging.Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (ed.) - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
„Interpretative Play“ by Courts and their Doctrinal Assumptions.Giedrė Lastauskienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1343-1359.
Is there a psychology of judging?Frederick Schauer - manuscript
Progress toward the Rule of Law in China.Jill O. Jasperson - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):249-270.
The Continuing Use of Problematic Sexual Stereotypes in Judicial Decision-Making.Jesse Elvin - 2010 - Feminist Legal Studies 18 (3):275-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-17

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references