Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (3):343-351 (2020)

Abstract
Palliative care names as one of its central aims to prevent and relieve suffering. Following the concept of “total pain”, which was first introduced by Cicely Saunders, PC not only focuses on the physical dimension of pain but also addresses the patient’s psychological, social, and spiritual suffering. However, the goal to relieve suffering can paradoxically lead to a taboo of suffering and imply adverse consequences. Two scenarios are presented: First, PC providers sometimes might fail their own ambitions. If all other means prove ineffective terminal sedation can still be applied as a last resort, though. However, it may be asked whether sedating a dying patient comes close to eliminating suffering by eliminating the sufferer and hereby resembles physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia. As an alternative, PC providers could continue treatment, even if it so far prove unsuccessful. In that case, either futility results or the patient might even suffer from the perpetuated, albeit fruitless interventions. Second, some patients possibly prefer to endure suffering instead of being relieved from it. Hence, they want to forgo the various bio-psycho-socio-spiritual interventions. PC providers’ efforts then lead to paradoxical consequences: Feeling harassed by PC, patients could suffer even more and not less. In both scenarios, suffering is placed under a taboo and is thereby conceptualised as not being tolerable in general. However, to consider suffering essentially unbearable might promote assisted dying not only on an individual but also on a societal level insofar as unbearable suffering is considered a criterion for euthanasia or PAS.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-019-09921-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Suffering.Bert Gordijn & Henk ten Have - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (3):333-334.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Palliative Sedation: Clinical Context and Ethical Questions.Farr Curlin - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (3):197-209.
The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives.D. Jeffrey - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):e9-e9.
Islam and Palliative Care.K. A. Choong - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (1):28-42.
“Nobody Understands”: On a Cardinal Phenomenon of Palliative Care.Tomasz Okon - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):13 – 46.
Physicians Should “Assist in Suicide” When It Is Appropriate.Timothy E. Quill - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):57-65.
The Double Life of Double Effect.Allison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-08

Total views
10 ( #877,353 of 2,454,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes