How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):222-225 (2010)

Most contributions to the current debate about the consideration and application of empirical information in ethics scholarship deal with epistemological issues such as the role and the meaning of empirical research in ethical reasoning. Despite the increased publication of empirical data in ethics literature we still lack systematic analyses and conceptual frameworks that would help us to understand the rarely discussed methodological and practical problems in appraising empirical research. This paper demonstrates the need for critical appraisal and its crucial methodological role in the application of empirical information in ethical reasoning. Furthermore, it systematically examines the criteria and the appropriate appraisal of empirical research and the associated challenges by highlighting current problems in empirical ethics literature. These problems reveal the following challenges for a critical and responsible consideration of empirical information in ethical reasoning: (i) training in the basic skills of locating and communicating empirical data from the relevant studies; (ii) training in basic knowledge of how to critically appraise empirical (qualitative and quantitative) research and its results; (iii) determination of quality standards for empirical ethics research; (iv) adequate reporting of the methodology and results of empirical ethics research in scientific journals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2009.033225
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,685
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Should We Teach Research Ethics?H. Davies - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (2):43-47.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Concepts of Empirical Ethics.Malcolm Parker - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (4):202-213.
Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy.Lars Bergström - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):117-129.
Empirical Research on Research Ethics.Joan E. Sieber - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
Four Detours.D. P. O'Brien - 1998 - Journal of Economic Methodology 5 (1):23-41.
Scepticism, Context and Modal Reasoning.Andrej Ule - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):9-30.
Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry.Guy Widdershoven (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
McAllister's Aesthetics in Science: A Critical Notice.David Davies - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):25 – 32.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #525,798 of 2,280,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #249,587 of 2,280,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature