Inferential and non-inferential reasoning

Abstract
It is sometimes suggested that there are two kinds of reasoning: inferential reasoning and non-inferential reasoning. However, it is not entirely clear what the difference between these two kinds of reasoning is. In this paper, I try to answer the question what this difference is. I first discuss three answers to this question that I argue are unsatisfactory. I then give a different answer to this question, and I argue that this answer is satisfactory. I end by showing that this answer can help to resolve some disagreements in which the difference between inferential and noninferential reasoning plays a role.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00001.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,975
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Practical Reality.Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
In the Beginning Was the Doing: The Premises of the Practical Syllogism.Wiland Eric - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):303-321.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

64 ( #77,208 of 2,051,011 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #203,924 of 2,051,011 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums