Philosophy International Journal 5 (2):000252 (2022)
AbstractThis paper addresses the important questions of whether love is possessive and, if so, in what way is it possessive and in what ways is it not. It argues that love is possessive in the way that loyalty is possessive, but it is not possessive in the ways that property-owners are possessive of their mere property, abusers are possessive of their partners, jealousy is possessive of the object it fears losing, or obsession is possessive of its object. By doing so it hopes to shed light on the nature of love as not only possessive, but as loyal and possessive in a loyal way rather than in other ways that might be confused with love.
Similar books and articles
The Meanings of Love: An Introduction to Philosophy of Love.Bob Wagoner - 1997 - Praeger.
Love and Agency.Kyla Ebels-Duggan - forthcoming - In Adrienne Martin (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy.
Wouldn’T It Be Nice: Enticing Reasons for Love.N. L. Engel-Hawbecker - 2021 - In Simon Cushing (ed.), New Philosophical Essays on Love and Loving. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 195-214.
Self Love.[author unknown] - 2005 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.
The Paradox of Aquinas’s Altruism: From Self-Love to Love of Others.R. Mary Hayden - 1989 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63:72-83.
Understanding Love: Philosophy, Film, & Fiction.Susan Wolf & Christopher Grau (eds.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
On Neighborly and Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love.Matt Rosen - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy and Scripture 8:1-20.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads