Objective evidence and absence: Comment on Sober

Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100 (2009)
Michael Strevens
New York University
Elliott Sober argues that the statistical slogan “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” cannot be taken literally: it must be interpreted charitably as claiming that the absence of evidence is (typically) not very much evidence of absence. I offer an alternative interpretation, on which the slogan claims that absence of evidence is (typically) not objective evidence of absence. I sketch a definition of objective evidence, founded in the notion of an epistemically objective likelihood, and I show that in Sober’s paradigm case, the slogan can, on this understanding, be sustained.
Keywords Likelihood  Evidence  Elliott Sober
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9312-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses.Michael Strevens - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):515-537.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence in Biology and the Conditions of Success.Jacob Stegenga - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (6):981-1004.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
73 ( #92,090 of 2,308,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #215,530 of 2,308,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature