Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (2):503-528 (2008)

Must the state handle the adjudication of disputes? Researchers of different perspectives, from heterodox scholars of law who advocate legal pluralism to libertarian economists who advocate the privatization of law, have increasingly questioned the idea that the state is, or should be, the only source of law. Both groups point out that government law has problems and that non-state alternatives exist. This Article discusses some problems with the public judicial system and several for-profit alternatives. Public courts lack both incentives to embrace customer orientation and pricing mechanisms, plus they face problems associated with the bureaucratic provision of services. When parties are able to choose their tribunals, in contrast, those tribunals must provide service to customers and be mindful about conserving resources. Competition between arbitrators also can allow for experimentation and the provision of customized services rather than a centrally planned, one-size-fits-all system. Contracts with arbitration clauses can easily stipulate the choice of tribunal, and we argue that if government courts simply refused to overrule binding arbitration agreements, de facto privatization could easily take place. This Article discusses how the private adjudication of disputes could enable the market to internalize externalities and provide services that customers desire.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2202/1565-3404.1195
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,291
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Market Anarchism as Constitutionalism.Roderick T. Long - 2008 - In Roderick T. Long & Tibor R. Machan (eds.), Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country? Ashgate. pp. 133-154.
Trial Courts and Adjudication.Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Overcoming Difficulties in Privatizing Roads.Walter Block - 2003 - Etica E Politica 5 (2):1-18.
A Nuanced Approach to the Privatization Debate.Talia Fisher - 2011 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (1):72-110.
Luck in the Courts.Menachem Mautner - 2008 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (1):217-238.
Saudi Administrative Contracts and Arbitrability.Alrashidi Razq - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Stirling
Privatizing Competition Regulation.Karen Yeung - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (4):581-615.
Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons From Bitcoin.Pietro Ortolani - 2016 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (3):595-629.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,109,128 of 2,456,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,366 of 2,456,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes