Replies to Kaczor and Rodger

Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1941-1944 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In these replies, I shall respond to criticisms offered by Kaczor and Rodger to my article titled “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.” In the process, I shall also try to bring into focus why the possibility of ectogestation will radically alter the shape of the abortion debate.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s13347-020-00439-y

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why Ectogestation is Unlikely to Transform the Abortion Debate: A discussion of 'Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion'.Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-7.
Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen.Daniel Rodger, Bruce P. Blackshaw & Clinton Wilcox - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (3):215-219.
Fuller Defenses and Partial Critiques: a Discussion of “Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion”.Christopher Kaczor - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1937-1939.
Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.Christopher M. Stratman - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):683-700.
Book review of "The Ethics of Abortion" by C. Kaczor. [REVIEW]Gerald Keaney - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):319-321.
Abortion Rights: For and Against.Kate Greasley & Christopher Kaczor - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Pro‐Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.Joona Räsänen - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (9):656-662.
Forbidding Intentional Mutilation: Some Unintended Consequences?Heidi M. Giebel - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):467-476.
Why pro‐life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics.Joona Räsänen - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (9):628-633.
Forbidding intentional mutilation: Some unintended consequences?Heidi M. Giebel - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):467-476.
"The Ethics of Abortion" by Christopher Kaczor. [REVIEW]Jason Cruze - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):485-490.
Abortion for fetal defects: two current arguments.Susana Nuccetelli - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (3):447-450.
Kate Greasley and Christopher Kaczor, Abortion Rights: For and Against.Melissa Moschella - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (5):571-574.
Could Artificial Wombs End the Abortion Debate?Christopher Kaczor - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2):283-301.
The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice by Christopher Kaczor. [REVIEW]Grattan Brown - 2013 - Nova et Vetera 11 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-12

Downloads
330 (#58,021)

6 months
79 (#52,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Stratman
University of Texas at San Antonio

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ectogestation and the Problem of Abortion.Christopher M. Stratman - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):683-700.

Add more references