The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas

Sociological Theory 19 (2):165-186 (2001)

From a certain perspective, Habermas's theory of communicative action is a response, in extension of Mead, Schutz, and Parsons, to the risk of dissension posed by double contingency. Starting from double contingency, both The Theory of Communicative Action and Between Facts and Norms are essentially an elaboration of a solution to this problem in terms of a more fully developed theory of communication than had been available to his predecessors. Given the intense concentration and the immense expenditure of energy on the working out of the coordinating accomplishments and structures required by the complex solution envisaged by him, it is unsurprising that Habermas overlooks the next most important problem intermittently raised by the theory of communicative action, namely, the problem of "triple contingency," that is, the contingency that the public brings into the social process. This has far-reaching implications for Habermas's place in the sociological tradition and for the relation of the younger generation to him. Because of his continued search for a solution to a problem posed in the classical phase of sociology and his concomitant failure to develop the new problem that he himself raised in the course of so doing, he can be classified with Parsons as being a neoclassical sociologist. He nevertheless bequeaths a serious problem to contemporary sociology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0735-2751.00135
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,238
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Logic of the Social Sciences.Jürgen Habermas - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):413-428.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Latent Cognitive Sociology in Habermas.Piet Strydom - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (3):273-291.
Pragmatism as a Communication-Theoretical Tradition: An Assessment of Craig‘s Pro-Posal.Mats Bergman - 2012 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (1):208-221.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
Invariant Constructions of Simple and Maximal Sets.Frank P. Weber - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (2):143-160.
The Looping Problem.F. Hervouet - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):216-217.
Habermas Ii.David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.) - 2010 - Sage Publications.
Habermas.Jason L. Powell (ed.) - 2012 - Nova Science Publishers.


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #218,571 of 2,285,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #71,280 of 2,285,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature