Authors
Lloyd Strickland
Manchester Metropolitan University
Abstract
One of the most pressing philosophical problems in early modern Europe concerned how the soul and body could form a unity, or, as many understood it, how these two substances could work together. It was widely believed that there were three (and only three) hypotheses regarding the union of soul and body: (1) physical influence, (2) occasionalism, and (3) pre-established harmony. However, in 1763, a fourth hypothesis was put forward by the French thinker André-Pierre Le Guay de Prémontval (1716–1764). Prémontval’s hypothesis, given the grand name of “psychocracy” (i.e., the dominion or the rule of the soul), held that there was a real influence between soul and body, but that this was an immaterial kind of influence as opposed to the physical kind that had been entertained heretofore. Prémontval’s hypothesis is the focus of this paper. I shall begin by sketching out the details of Prémontval’s hypothesis (Section 1), then proceed to consider its claims to constitute a true fourth hypothesis distinct from the other three (Section 2), before closing by briefly considering two objections and the responses either that Prémontval himself made or that may be made on his behalf (Section 3).
Keywords Mind-body problem  Physical influx  Early modern philosophy  Prémontval
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.025
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Wolfgang Schwarz - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Racial Mind–Body Unions.John Harfouch & John Elias Nale - 2015 - Continental Philosophy Review 48 (1):41-58.
The Mind-Body Problem.Tim Crane - 1999 - In Rob Wilson & Frank Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Mind and Body.Adam Harmer - 2015 - Oxford Handbook of Leibniz.
Mind -- Body -- Spirituality.Harald Walach - 2007 - Mind and Matter 5 (2):215-240.
Leibniz on the Union of Body and Soul.Marleen Rozemond - 1997 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79 (2):150-178.
Cognitive Closure And Body-Mind Problem In Mcginn’s Philosophy.Monika Szachniewicz - 2011 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 6 (4):37-53.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-12

Total views
201 ( #42,932 of 2,344,621 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,416 of 2,344,621 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes