Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79 (2003)
Science's priority rule rewards those who are first to make a discovery, at the expense of all other scientists working towards the same goal, no matter how close they may be to making the same discovery. I propose an explanation of the priority rule that, better than previous explanations, accounts for the distinctive features of the rule. My explanation treats the priority system, and more generally, any scheme of rewards for scientific endeavor, as a device for achieving an allocation of resources among different research programs that provides as much benefit as possible to society. I show that the priority system is especially well suited to finding an efficient allocation of resources in those situations, characteristic of scientific inquiry, in which any success in an endeavor subsequent to the first success brings little additional benefit to society.
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):574-587.
Kuhn Vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (1):117-124.
Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor.Ryan Muldoon - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):117-125.
Similar books and articles
Equality, Efficiency, and the Priority of the Worse-Off.Peter Vallentyne - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):1-19.
Self-Realization and the Priority of Fair Equality of Opportunity.Robert S. Taylor - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):333-347.
Economic Approaches to Understanding Scientific Norms.Michael Strevens - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):184-200.
Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing.Lucy Frith - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):139-151.
Inhibition.Cynthia M. Connine & Paul C. LoCasto - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-328.
Monism and Intrinsicality.Kelly Trogdon - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):127 – 148.
Conflicts of Rules in Hooker's Rule-Consequentialism.Ben Eggleston - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):329-349.
On the Possibility of Nonaggregative Priority for the Worst Off.Marc Fleurbaey, Bertil Tungodden & Peter Vallentyne - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):258-285.
The Justificational Priority of Science Over the Philosophy of Science: Laudan's Science and Hypothesis.A. A. Derksen - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):259-264.
Added to index2010-04-16
Total downloads65 ( #80,083 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,270 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?