Abstract
Culturally different connotations of basic concepts challenge the comparative study of religion. Do persons in Germany or in the United States refer to the same concepts when talking about ‘spirituality’ and ‘religion’? Does it make a difference how they identify themselves? The Bielefeld-Chattanooga Cross-Cultural Study on ‘Spirituality’ includes a semantic differential approach for the comparison of self-identified “neither religious nor spiritual”, “religious”, and “spiritual” persons regarding semantic attributes attached to the concepts ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality’ in each research context. Results show that ‘spirituality’ is used as a broader concept than ‘religion’. Regarding religion, semantics attributed by self-identified religious persons differ significantly from those of the spiritual persons. The ‘spiritual’ and the ‘religious’ groups agree on semantics attributed to spirituality but differ from the ‘neither spiritual nor religious’ group. Qualifications of differences and agreements become visible from the comparison between the United States and Germany. It is argued for the semantically sensitive study of culturally situated ‘spiritualities’.
Keywords cross-cultural   religiosity   religion   semantics   spirituality   semantic differential
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15736121-12341254
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,205
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Theologische Realenzyklopädie.[author unknown] - 1969 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 11:112-115.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceptions of Spirituality Among the Dutch Population.Joantine Berghuijs, Jos Pieper & Cok Bakker - 2013 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 35 (3):369-397.
Beyond “Religion” and “Spirituality”.James Murphy - 2017 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 39 (1):1-26.
Posttraumatic Growth in Case of Internal Displacement.Ketevan Mosashvili & Constantin Klein - 2017 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 39 (2):118-137.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards Religious-Spirituality: A Multidimensional Matrix of Religion and Spirituality.Sahaya G. Selvam - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (36):129-152.
Spirituality and Social Work.Maryann Krieglstein - 2006 - Dialogue and Universalism 16 (5-6):21-29.
Religiosity Scales: What Are We Measuring in Whom?Marsha Cutting & Michelle Walsh - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 30 (1):137-153.
Religiosity Scales: What Are We Measuring in Whom?Marsha Cutting & Michelle Walsh - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 30 (1):137-153.
Spirituality, Ethics, and Care.Simon Robinson - 2007 - Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
19 ( #558,208 of 2,444,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,256 of 2,444,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes