Abstract
The number of citations a paper receives is the most commonly used measure of scientific impact. In this paper, we study not only the number but also the type of citations that 659 marketing articles generated. We discern five citation types: application, affirmation, negation, review and perfunctory mention. Prior literature in scientometrics recognizes that the former three types, on average, signal a higher level of scientific indebtedness than the latter two types. In our sample, these three types of citation represent only 15% of all citations. We also find different determinants of citation behavior across citation types. Across the 49 determinants we included, only 13 have the same effect across all citation types, of which only 5 are statistically significant across all citation types. For instance, we find a significant inverted U-effect of challenging commonly held beliefs on citation counts, but only for three of the citation types: affirmation, review and perfunctory mention. Our results encourage scientific stakeholders to move beyond mere citation counts to assess a paper's or a scholar's scientific contribution, as well as to devote greater attention to the citation process itself. 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is It Ethical for Journals to Request Self-Citation?Omid Mahian & Somchai Wongwises - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):531-533.
A Citation-Based Ranking of the Business Ethics Scholarly Journals.Nick Bontis & Alexander Serenko - 2009 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (4):390-399.
Die Bedeutung der Zitatenanalyse Für Die Wissenschaftsforschung.Wolfgang G. Stock - 1985 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (2):304-314.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-22

Total views
9 ( #910,109 of 2,439,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,463 of 2,439,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes