Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):6 (2007)
This paper explores a novel philosophy of ethical care in the face of burgeoning biomedical technologies. I respond to a serious challenge facing traditional bioethics with its roots in analytic philosophy. The hallmarks of these traditional approaches are reason and autonomy, founded on a belief in the liberal humanist subject. In recent years, however, there have been mounting challenges to this view of human subjectivity, emerging from poststructuralist critiques, such as Michel Foucault's, but increasingly also as a result of advances in biotechnology itself. In the face of these developments, I argue that the theoretical relevance and practical application of mainstream bioethics is increasingly under strain. Traditionalists will undoubtedly resist. Together, professional philosopher-bioethicists, public health policymakers, and the global commercial healthcare industry tend to respond conservatively by shoring up the liberal humanist subject as the foundation for medical ethics and consumer decision-making, appealing to the familiar tropes of reason, autonomy, and freedom.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Declaration of Healthy Dependence: The Case of Home Care.Elin Palm - 2012 - Health Care Analysis (4):1-20.
Towards an Ethics of Authentic Practice.Stuart J. Murray, Dave Holmes, Amélie Perron & Geneviève Rail - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):682-689.
Cancer Knowledge in the Plural: Queering the Biopolitics of Narrative and Affective Mobilities. [REVIEW]Mary K. Bryson & Jackie Stacey - 2013 - Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2):197-212.
Psychopharmacological Enhancement: A Conceptual Framework.Dan J. Stein - 2012 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7 (1):5.
Similar books and articles
What is the Rational Care Theory of Welfare? A Comment on Stephen Darwall's Welfare and Rational Care.Fred Feldman - manuscript
Biotechnology and Commodification Within Health Care.Mark J. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):267 – 287.
An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction.Carmel Shalev - 2012 - Medicine Studies 3 (3):147-156.
Life, Technology, and Law: Second Forum for Transnational and Comparative Legal Dialogue, Levico Terme, Italy, June 9-10, 2006: Proceedings. [REVIEW]Carlo Casonato (ed.) - 2007 - Cedam.
Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good.David S. Oderberg - manuscript
Life, Death, Genes, and Ethics: Biotechnology and Bioethics.M. J. Charlesworth - 1989 - Abc Enterprises for the Australian Broadcasting.
The Good Life and the Human Good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Is the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide Compatible with Good End-of-Life Care?Michael B. Gill - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):27-45.
Reconfiguring the Bioethics of Reproduction.Margrit Shildrick - 2004 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):77-85.
The Three Teachings of Biotechnology.Mickey Gjerris - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?Lawrence Busch & John R. Lloyd - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2005 - Medical Law Review 13:328-356.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads13 ( #357,550 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?