Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment

Erkenntnis 75 (3):303-324 (2011)
Abstract
This essay aims to sharpen debates on the pros and cons of historical epistemology, which is now understood as a novel approach to the study of knowledge, by comparing it with the history of epistemology as traditionally pursued by philosophers. The many versions of both approaches are not always easily discernable. Yet, a reasoned comparison of certain versions can and should be made. In the first section of this article, I argue that the most interesting difference involves neither the subject matter nor goal, but the methods used by the two approaches. In the second section, I ask which of the two approaches or methods is more promising given that both historical epistemologists and historians of epistemology claim to contribute to epistemology simpliciter . Using traditional problems concerning the epistemic role of perception, I argue that the historical epistemologies of Wartofsky and Daston and Galison fail to show that studying practices of perception is philosophically significant. Standard methods from the history of epistemology are more promising, as I show by means of reconstructing arguments in a debate about the relation between perception and judgment in psychological research on the famous moon illusion
Keywords Epistemology  History of Epistemology  Historical Epistemology  Objectivity  Perception  Judgment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-011-9338-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Epistemology and Cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - the Mit Press.
Historical Ontology.Ian Hacking - 2002 - Harvard University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Plea for a Historical Epistemology of Research.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):105-111.
Epistemology Dehumanized.Panayot Butchvarov - 2008 - In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 301.
Epistemology in an Age of Cognitive Science.Robert N. Mccauley - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):143-152.
Systems-Oriented Social Epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3:189-214.
Added to PP index
2011-11-03

Total downloads
88 ( #60,905 of 2,192,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #17,267 of 2,192,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature