In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. Oxford University Press (2001)
This essay reconsiders Kant's denial of scientific status to the discipline of empirical psychology, which have often been viewed as quite problematic. In the preface to the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, Kant denies that psychology can be natural science proper. I argue that Kant's impossibility claim is based on a very specific conception of science that he did not put forward elsewhere, and that is restricted to *natural* sciences in any case. Also, Kant's critical remarks are directed merely against a particular conception of psychology, namely one going back to Baumgarten and adopted by many psychologists in the eighteenth century, according to which introspection is the sole means of gathering empirical evidence about the mind. Although this particular conception of psychology precludes it from being natural science proper, it is possible that other conceptions of psychology could allow it to be scientific. Also, for Kant the study of the mind should not be introspection-based. He himself developed a "pragmatic anthropology", which he viewed as a significant factor in our knowledge of the world
|Keywords||Kant Empirical Psychology Mathematical Science Introspection Tetens, Johann Nicolas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Did Kant Reject Physiological Explanations in His Anthropology?Thomas Sturm - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):495-505.
Kant on Anthropology and Alienology: The Opacity of Human Motivation and its Anthropological Implications.Alix Cohen - 2008 - Kantian Review 13 (2):85-106.
Similar books and articles
Is There a Problem with Mathematical Psychology in the Eighteenth Century? A Fresh Look at Kant’s Old Argument.Thomas Sturm - 2006 - . Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 42:353-377.
Kant and the Scientific Study of Consciousness.Thomas Sturm & Falk Wunderlich - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (3):48-71.
The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding.A. R. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):149-164.
Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action.Patrick Frierson - 2005 - Philosophers' Imprint 5 (7):1-34.
Empirical, Rational, and Transcendental Psychology: Psychology as Science and as Philosophy.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200–227.
The Divorce of Reason and Experience: Kant's Paralogisms of Pure Reason in Context.Corey W. Dyck - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 249-275.
Kant’s Critique of Determinism in Empirical Psychology.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1995 - In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press.
Christian Wolff's Prolegomena to Empirical and Rational Psychology: Translation and Commentary.Robert J. Richards - unknown
The Critique of Psychology: From Kant to Postcolonial Theory.Thomas Teo - 2005 - Springer.
Added to index2011-10-25
Total downloads55 ( #90,936 of 2,143,902 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #163,291 of 2,143,902 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.