Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):243-263 (2001)
Alexandre Koyré was one of the most prominent historians of science of the twentieth century. The standard interpretation of Koyré is that he falls squarely within the internalist camp of historians of science—that he focuses on the history of the ideas themselves, eschewing cultural and sociological interpretations regarding the influence of ideologies and institutions on the development of science. When we read what Koyré has to say about his historical studies , we find him embracing and championing this Platonic view of his work. Ultimately I think this interpretation of Koyré's history of science is lopsided and in need of correction. I claim, rather, that a careful reading of Koyré's work suggests that a tension exists between internal and external methodological considerations. The external considerations stem from Koyré's commitment to the unity of human thought and the influence he admits that the ‘transscientifiques’ have on the development of science. I suggest in conclusion then, that if we are to put a philosophical label on his work, rather than ‘Platonist’, as has been the custom, ‘Hegelian’ makes a better fit
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions.Imre Lakatos - 1971 - In R. C. Buck & R. S. Cohen (eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. D. Reidel. pp. 91-108.
Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate.Steven Shapin - 1992 - History of Science 30 (90):333-369.
Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Concepts They Had No Linguistic Means to Express?Gad Prudovsky - 1997 - History and Theory 36 (1):15-31.
Hegel à Iéna. (A propos de publications récentes).A. Koyré - 1934 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 118 (9/10):274 - 283.
Duhem and Continuity in the History of Science.Roger Ariew & Peter Barker - 1992 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46 (182):323-343.
Citations of this work BETA
Claiming Ownership in the Technosciences: Patents, Priority and Productivity.Christine MacLeod & Gregory Radick - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):188-201.
Saving the Strong Programme? A Critique of David Bloor's Recent Work.Stephen Kemp - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):707-720.
Similar books and articles
History of Science Through Koyre's Lenses.B. J. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):243-263.
Koyré on the History of Cosmology. [REVIEW]J. Agassi - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):234-245.
Review: Koyré on the History of Cosmology. [REVIEW]J. Agassi - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):234 - 245.
Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyré Revisited.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Helene Metzger: The History of Science Between the Study of Mentalities and Total History.C. Chimisso - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):203-241.
Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited.R. M. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
The Origins of Modern Science: A New Interpretation.A. Koyre - 1956 - Diogenes 4 (16):1-22.
Present Trends of French Philosophical Thought.Alexandre Koyre - 1998 - Journal of the History of Ideas 59 (3):531-548.
Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure: Can They Survive in the Market Place of Ideas? [REVIEW]Chance W. Lewis & BethRené Roepnack - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):221-232.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads8 ( #476,079 of 2,143,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,643 of 2,143,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.