How to think about rules and rule following

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):307-323 (2005)
Abstract
This article will discuss the difficulties of providing a plausible account of rule following in the social realm. It will show that the cognitive model of rule following is not suited for this task. Nevertheless, revealing the inadequacy of the cognitive model does not justify the wholesale dismissal of understanding human practices as rule-following practices, as social theorists like Bourdieu or Dreyfus have argued. Instead it will be shown that rule-following behavior is best understood as being based on a set of complex dispositions. In this manner one is able to account for the causal explanatory role of the notion of a rule. Key Words: rules • norms • explanation • Bourdieu • Winch.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393105277988
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rule Following: A Pedestrian Approach.Masahiro Yamada - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):283-311.
How Not to Structure a Social Theory: A Reply to a Critical Response.Anthony King - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):464-479.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
55 ( #97,073 of 2,180,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,815 of 2,180,553 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums