Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):1-27 (2021)
AbstractTravel for reproductive health care has become a widespread global phenomenon. Within the field, the decision to travel to seek third parties to assist with reproduction is widely assumed to be autonomous. However there has been scant research exploring the application of the principle of autonomy to the experience of the cross-border traveller. Seeking to contribute to the growing, but still small, body of sociological bioethics research, this paper maps the application of the ethical principle of autonomy to the lived experience of infertile individuals who cross borders for reproductive care. It examines their choices as patient, consumer and traveller. It suggests that their experience evidences a contradictory autonomy, which offers them both choice and no choice in their final decision to travel. The paper argues that this lack of meaningful autonomy is enabled by a medicalised framework of infertility which prioritises technology as the cure to infertility. This both shapes expectations of infertile individuals and limits their options of family creation. Ultimately, the paper suggests that sociological bioethics research shows that the liberatory credentials of technology should be questioned, and identifies that this field demands greater scholarly attention.
Similar books and articles
How to Address the Ethics of Reproductive Travel to Developing Countries: A Comparison of National Self-Sufficiency and Regulated Market Approaches.G. K. D. Crozier & Dominique Martin - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (1):45-54.
Exploitation in Cross-Border Reproductive Care.Angela Ballantyne - 2014 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (2):75-99.
Cross-Border Sex Selection: Ethical Challenges Posed by a Globalizing Practice.Rajani Bhatia - 2014 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (2):185-218.
How to Address the Ethics of Reproductive Travel to Developing Countries: A Comparison of National Self‐Sufficiency and Regulated Market Approaches.Dominique Martin G. Crozier - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (1):45-54.
Cross-Border Reproductive Travel, Neocolonialism, and Canadian Policy.Katy Fulfer - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):225-247.
Honeymoon, Medical Treatment or Big Business? An Analysis of the Meanings of the Term “Reproductive Tourism” in German and Israeli Public Media Discourses.Sharon Bassan & Merle A. Michaelsen - 2013 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:9.
Reproductive Outsourcing: An Empirical Ethics Account of Cross-Border Reproductive Care in Canada.Vincent Couture, Régen Drouin, Jean-Marie Moutquin, Patricia Monnier & Chantal Bouffard - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):41-47.
Cross‐Border Health Care in the European Union: Recent Legal Implications of 'Decker and Kohll'.Herbert E. G. M. Hermans - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (4):431-439.
Travel for Abortion as a Form of Migration.Amy Reed-Sandoval - 2021 - Essays in Philosophy 22 (1):28-44.
Egg Freezing: A Breakthrough for Reproductive Autonomy?Karey Harwood - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):39-46.
Globalisation and Market Orientation: A Challenge Within Reproductive Medicine.Gabriele Werner-Felmayer - 2018 - In Sayani Mitra, Silke Schicktanz & Tulsi Patel (eds.), Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives From India, Germany and Israel. Springer Verlag. pp. 13-34.
Postnatal Reproductive Autonomy: Promoting Relational Autonomy and Self-Trust in New Parents.Sara Goering - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):9-19.
Changing Fertility Landscapes: Exploring the Reproductive Routes and Choices of Fertility Patients From China for Assisted Reproduction in Russia.Christina Weis - 2021 - Asian Bioethics Review 13 (1):7-22.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.