Authors
Karsten Stueber
College of the Holy Cross
Abstract
_ Source: _Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 393 - 409 This essay will utilize the central historicist insight about the nature of the historical world and historical writing in articulating the cognitive function of narratives. It will argue that full-blown narratives are best understood as developmental portraits of a chosen entity/ unit in respect to its individuality. The argument will proceed through a critical analysis of the debate between Noel Carroll and David Velleman about the nature of the narrative connection and the question of whether the explanatory force of a narrative has to be understood in causal or emotional terms. I will side with the causalist in this respect but will also show that we need to be very careful in distinguishing between causal explanations underwritten by a theory and the use made of such causal accounts within the context of narratives concerned with explicating individuality. Accordingly, I agree with Mink that narratives are special cognitive instruments. Yet Mink’s characterization of narrative understanding as a “configurational mode of comprehension” that is strictly distinguished from the theoretical mode needs to be amended. Narrative understanding should be conceived as an autonomous and irreducible mode of comprehension. At the same time, it should be viewed as being dependent on a variety of theoretical perspectives it uses intricately
Keywords Velleman   causality   Carroll   historicism   narrative explanation   Mink
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18722636-12341309
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Narrative Closure.Noël Carroll - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (1):1 - 15.
Narratives and Action Explanation.Thomas Uebel - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):31-67.
Historical Explanation, Folk Psychology, and Narrative.Mark Bevir - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):152 – 168.
Modes of Comprehension and the Unity of Knowledge.Louis O. Mink - 1960 - Atti Del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 5:411-417.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Louis Mink's Linguistic Turn.Richard T. Vann - 1987 - History and Theory 26 (1):1-14.
Mink’s Riddle of Narrative Truth.Chiel van den Akker - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):346-370.
Collingwood and Weber Vs. Mink: History After the Cognitive Turn.Stephen Turner - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260.
Embodied Narratives.Richard Menary - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6):63-84.
Narrative Explanations: The Case of History.Paul A. Roth - 1988 - History and Theory 27 (1):1-13.
Understanding Narrative Explanation.Björn Eriksson - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):317-344.
When Analytic Narratives Explain.Anna Alexandrova - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):1-24.
On the Nature and Role of Narrative in Historiography.William Dray - 1971 - History and Theory 10 (2):153-171.
Narrative Pictures.Bence Nanay - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):119 - 129.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-11-07

Total views
37 ( #278,881 of 2,420,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #67,955 of 2,420,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes