Contemporary Political Theory 13 (1):23 (2014)
AbstractJudith Shklar’s dictum, ‘the worst evil of cruelty’, is well known. What this means for her political theory and how such theory is construed are rarely explored. This article maintains that Shklar’s turn towards cruelty/suffering has a specific role in the development of her political argument. It allows her both to curb her long-standing skepticism, and to use it creatively. This is because suffering must be examined from the perspectives of history and philosophy, which produce two sets of knowledge, each limiting the overbearing tendencies of the other. The way Shklar uses the tension between history and philosophy for progressive purposes, and her idea that politics can mediate between history and philosophy, makes her a very contemporary theorist, similar to those who critically engage foundationalism without wanting to dispose of it completely. Approaching Shklar’s ‘Putting Cruelty First’ through her engagement with history and philosophy, and making use of the concepts of ‘realism’ and ‘weak ontology’ to do so are a more productive route to understanding her dictum than the usual one of examining it through the prism of her ‘liberalism of fear’
Similar books and articles
‘Citizen jurisprudence’ and the people’s power in Spinoza.Christopher Skeaff - 2013 - Contemporary Political Theory 12 (3):146.
Sex, gender and heteronormativity: Seeing |[lsquo]|Some Like It Hot|[rsquo]| as a heterosexual dystopia.Terrell Carver - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):125.
Sex, violence and crime: Foucault and the |[lsquo]|man|[rsquo]| question.Terrell Carver - 2010 - Contemporary Political Theory 9 (3):347.
‘When I Was Young and Politically Engaged...’: Lefort on the Problem of Political Commitment.Geenens Raf - 2006 - Thesis Eleven 87 (1):19-32.
A |[lsquo]|Creative Power|[rsquo]|?: The Uses of Deleuze. A Review Essay.Simon Tormey - 2005 - Contemporary Political Theory 4 (4):414.
‘Agonistic Pluralism’ and Three Archetypal Forms of Politics.Mark Wenman - 2003 - Contemporary Political Theory 2 (2):165.
‘Imagined Autonomy’: or, Any Colour You Like, as Long as it's Green.Mathew Humphrey - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2):246.
‘Democratic Taxation’ and Quantifiable Action: Scientizing Dilemmas.Mindy Peden - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (3):302.
Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the |[lsquo]|Politics of Recognition|[rsquo]| in Canada.Glen S. Coulthard - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4):437.
A radical freedom|[quest]| Gianni Vattimo's |[lsquo]|emancipatory nihilism|[rsquo]|.James Martin - 2010 - Contemporary Political Theory 9 (3):325.
Inverting Agamben: Gendered popular sovereignty and the Natasha Wars of Cairo.Paul Amar - 2014 - Contemporary Political Theory 13 (3):263.
‘Let the Dead Bury their Dead’: Marx, Derrida and Bloch.Vincent Geoghegan - 2002 - Contemporary Political Theory 1 (1):5.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Judith N. Shklar on disobedience and obligation in a “society of strangers”.Rieke Trimcev - 2022 - Constellations 29 (1):65-79.
References found in this work
Realism in political theory.William A. Galston - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4):385-411.
Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry.Michael Ignatieff, Kwame Anthony Appiah, David A. Hollinger, Thomas W. Laqueur & Diane F. Orentlicher - 2001 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Realism, liberal moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi.John Horton - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4):431-448.