Erratum to: The Myth of Efficiency: Technology and Ethics in Industrial Food Production [Book Review]
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):257-257 (2013)
Abstract In this paper, we explore how the application of technological tools has reshaped food production systems in ways that foster large-scale outbreaks of foodborne illness. Outbreaks of foodborne illness have received increasing attention in recent years, resulting in a growing awareness of the negative impacts associated with industrial food production. These trends indicate a need to examine systemic causes of outbreaks and how they are being addressed. In this paper, we analyze outbreaks linked to ground beef and salad greens. These case studies are informed by personal interviews, site visits, and an extensive review of government documents and peer-reviewed literature. To explore these cases, we draw from actor-network theory and political economy to analyze the relationships between technological tools, the design of industrial production systems, and the emergence and spread of pathogenic bacteria. We also examine if current responses to outbreaks represent reflexive change. Lastly, we use the myth of Prometheus to discuss ethical issues regarding the use of technology in food production. Our findings indicate that current tools and systems were designed with a narrow focus on economic efficiency, while overlooking relationships with pathogenic bacteria and negative social impacts. In addition, we find that current responses to outbreaks do not represent reflexive change and a continued reliance on technological fixes to systemic problems may result in greater problems in the future. We argue that much can be learned from the myth of Prometheus. In particular, justice and reverence need to play a more significant role in guiding production decisions. Content Type Journal Article Category Articles Pages 1-26 DOI 10.1007/s10806-011-9357-8 Authors Diana Stuart, Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Drive, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA Michelle R. Woroosz, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, 306A Comer Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA Journal Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Online ISSN 1573-322X Print ISSN 1187-7863.
|Keywords||Food processing Food safety Technology Reflexive modernization Ground beef Bagged salad|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.Ulrich Beck, Wolfgang Bonss & Christoph Lau - 2003 - Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2):1-33.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The End of the Green Revolution.Scott D. Soby - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):537-546.
Schanbacer, William D: The Politics of Food: The Global Conflict Between Food Security and Food Sovereignty. [REVIEW]Cornelia Butler Flora - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):545-547.
The Ethics of Food for Tomorrow: On the Viability of Agrarianism—How Far Can It Go? Comments on Paul Thompson's Agrarian Vision.Raymond Anthony - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):543-552.
The World Agricultural System and Ethical Considerations Relating to the Rural Environment: Some Perspectives on Cause and Effect in Underdeveloped Countries.Brian Furze - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):59-67.
Biotechnology is Not Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
H. Wittman, A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe (Eds.): Food Sovereignty: Reconnecting Food, Nature and Community. [REVIEW]Charles Francis - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):305-307.
Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW]Johan de Tavernier - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
Practical and Ethical Considerations of Agricultural Research Assistance for the Third World.J. S. Gavora & E. E. Lister - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (4):307-322.
Conflict of Interest From a Romanian Geneticist's Perspective.Ioana Ispas - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):363-381.
WTO, Public Reason and Food Public Reasoning in the 'Trade Conflict' on GM-Food.Frans W. A. Brom - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (4):417 - 431.
Food Law, Ethics, and Food Safety Regulation: Roles, Justifications, and Expected Limits. [REVIEW]Daniel Sperling - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):267-278.
Douglas Harper and Patrizia Faccioli: The Italian Way: Food & Social Life. [REVIEW]Gigi Berardi - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):929-932.
Sustainability in Cattle Production Systems.C. J. C. Phillips & J. Tind Sorensen - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):61-73.
A Short History of Food Ethics.Hub Zwart - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):113-126.
Nathalie Cook (Ed): What's to Eat? Entrées in Canadian Food History. [REVIEW]Johanna Moyer - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (1):111-113.
Added to index2011-11-26
Total downloads46 ( #112,442 of 2,163,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?