Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):91-106 (2022)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The understanding of God’s mode of existence as eternal makes a significant difference to a variety of issues in contemporary philosophy of religion, including, for instance, the apparent incompatibility of divine omniscience with human freedom. But the concept has come under attack in current philosophical discussion as inefficacious to solve the philosophical puzzles for which it seems so promising. Although Boethius in the early 6th century thought that the concept could resolve the apparent incompatibility between divine foreknowledge and human free will, some contemporary philosophers, such as William Hasker, have argued that whatever help the concept of eternity may give with that puzzle is more than vitiated by the religiously pernicious implications of the concept for notions of God’s providence and action in time. In this paper, I will examine and respond to Hasker’s arguments against the doctrine of God’s eternity.
|
Keywords | Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.18290/rf2201.6 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 12 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Saving Eternity (and Divine Foreknowledge and Free Will): A Reply to Hasker.Katherin Rogers - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):79-89.
The Openness of God: Eternity and Free Will.Eleonore Stump - 2018 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Theistic Beliefs. De Gruyter. pp. 137-154.
Can eternity be saved? A comment on Stump and Rogers.William Hasker - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (2):137-148.
A Problem for Hasker: Freedom with Respect to the Present, Hard Facts, and Theological Incompatibilism.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
A Problem for Hasker: Freedom with Respect to the Present, Hard Facts, and Theological Incompatibilism.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Sufferer-Centered Requirements on Theodicy and All-Things-Considered Harms.Dustin Crummett - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8:71-95.
Future Freedom and the Fixity of Truth: Closing the Road to Limited Foreknowledge Open Theism. [REVIEW]Benjamin H. Arbour - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):189-207.
On William Hasker’s Theodicy, the Doctrine of Continuous Creation and the Nature of Morality.Dariusz Łukasiewicz - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):155-171.
Where Hasker’s Anti-Molinist Argument Goes Wrong.Arthur J. Cunningham - forthcoming - Faith and Philosophy.
Eternity and Providence.William Hasker - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro & Chad V. Meister (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Some Musings About William Hasker’s Philosophy of Mind.Stewart Goetz - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):37-48.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-04-09
Total views
5 ( #1,203,047 of 2,506,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,885 of 2,506,031 )
2022-04-09
Total views
5 ( #1,203,047 of 2,506,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,885 of 2,506,031 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads