Feminist Legal Studies 22 (3):285-306 (2014)
AbstractCryopreservation of human embryos remains, in many jurisdictions, a critical component of the use of the technology of in vitro fertilisation in assisted reproduction. However, although the reasons for the freezing of reproductive material—such as cost effectiveness and reducing risks of IVF—are a constant across jurisdictions, the desirable length of storage remains subject to ongoing regulatory debate. Internationally embryo storage limits are variable. This article features data from a recent Australian research project which explores individual attitudes, desires and understandings of law of IVF patients who had or who have embryos in storage. This article uses interviews from the study to argue that storage limits, like any apparently neutral regulatory tool, apply unequally causing unintended physical, mental and emotional harm—particularly to women. This analysis of storage limits exposes the interaction of time, science and law to create, apply and enforce norms and practices of ‘natural’ embryo storage, suggesting that the imposition of inflexible legislative restrictions upon embryo storage are socially contingent and value laden rather than ‘natural’ or ‘scientific’. This outcome has relevance to wider debates over assisted reproduction policies, suggesting that legal frameworks should adopt more flexibility in application to the patients who use this technology
Similar books and articles
They Can't Have My Embryo: The Ethics of Conditional Embryo Donation.Lucy Frith & Eric Blyth - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):317-324.
Processing capacity limits are not explained by storage limits.Graeme S. Halford, Steven Phillips & William H. Wilson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):123-124.
The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study. [REVIEW]Shizuko Takahashi, Misao Fujita, Akihisa Fujimoto, Toshihiro Fujiwara, Tetsu Yano, Osamu Tsutsumi, Yuji Taketani & Akira Akabayashi - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):9-.
Variability in the Storage and Use of Newborn Dried Bloodspots in Canada: Is it Time for National Standards?Denise Avard, Hilary Vallance, Cheryl Greenberg, Claude Laberge & Linda Kharaboyan - 2006 - Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (3):80-95.
Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.Katrien Devolder - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):533-536.
Short-term memory: Storage interference or storage decay?C. Michael Levy & Dennis Jowaisas - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):189.
Effect of stimulus rate, material, and storage instructions on recall of bisensory items: Storage or retrieval effects?Pamela C. Freundl & Gerald M. Senf - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (2):338.
Storage operators and directed lambda-calculus.René David & Karim Nour - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (4):1054-1086.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114.
Engineering human reproduction: A challenge to public policy.Samuel Gorovitz - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):267-274.
A semantical storage operator theorem for all types.Christophe Raffalli - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 91 (1):17-31.
A General Type for Storage Operators.Karim Nour - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (4):505-514.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order.Sheila Jasanoff (ed.) - 2004 - Routledge.
Simians, Cyborgs and Women the Reinvention of Nature.Donna Jeanne Haraway - 1991 - Routledge.
Postmenopausal motherhood: Immoral, illegal? A case study.Daniela Cutas - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (8):458–463.
Embryo disposition and the new death scene.David Ellison & Isabel Karpin - 2011 - Cultural Studies Review 17 (1):81-100.