Visual experience

I argue against a Disjunctive approach to visual experience. I then critique three 'common-factor' views: Qualia Theory, Intentionalism and Sense-Date Theory. The latter two are combined to form Intentional Trope Theory; and that view is defended
Keywords Epistemology  Experience  Metaphysics  Qualia  Visual
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9264.00031
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Visual Experience and Motor Action: Are the Bonds Too Tight?Andy Clark - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):495-519.
Searle's Theory of Visual Experience.Sean Wilkie - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):70-78.
Scents and Sensibilia.Clare Batty - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):103-118.
Transparency and the Unity of Experience.John O'Dea - 2008 - In E. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press. pp. 299.
The Admissible Contents of Visual Experience.Michael Tye - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):541-562.
Visual Qualia and Visual Content.Michael Tye - 1992 - In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 158--176.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

105 ( #47,567 of 2,168,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #49,748 of 2,168,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums