Art, Authenticity, and Understanding

In Jens Pier (ed.), Limits of Intelligibility: Issues from Kant and Wittgenstein. Routledge (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Early 20th century debates over the possibility of ‘metaphysics’ are grounded in a set of questions and answers whose central themes are already delineated in Kant’s critical philosophy. Wittgenstein and Carnap are sympathetic to Kant’s dismissal of transcendent metaphysics, but skeptical that there could be any substantive account of the fundamental conditions of our meaning-making. By contrast, Heidegger follows Fichte and the early German Romantics in seeing answers to the problems raised by metacritique not in science, but in the non-discursive forms of understanding and expression exemplified in art. This Romantic turn to art is not taken arbitrarily; it is motivated by methodological considerations that emerge within Kant’s own critical system. I take up the Kantian considerations which lead to an understanding of art as a window into the fundamental conditions of meaning-making before turning to Heidegger’s development of this line of thought. Next, I examine Carnap and Wittgenstein’s skepticism concerning the meaning of Heidegger’s philosophical terminology, focusing on what is perhaps the most problematic case: Heidegger’s talk of ‘the nothing’. I argue that this skepticism is overblown. Heidegger’s talk of the nothing is meaningful in the way that talk about figure and ground is meaningful: it serves as an ostensive indication of intersubjectively accessible structural features of our encounters with things. I conclude by drawing out the existential ramifications of the decision to speak or be silent, drawing on Audre Lorde to illustrate the place of art in making it possible for us to lead authentic lives.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Richard Peters and Valuing Authenticity.M. A. B. Degenhardt - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (Supplement s1):209-222.
Authenticity: Existential Virtue Or Platonic Ideal?Mindi Torrey - 2007 - Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):16-26.
Watsuji Tetsurō’s Concept of “Authenticity”.Kyle Michael James Shuttleworth - 2019 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 11 (3):235-250.
Restaurant Authenticity.Lisa Heldke - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 61:94-99.
Homo Touristicus, or the Jargon of Authenticity 2.0.Gregory Morgan Swer - 2019 - South African Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):210-218.
Performance and Authenticity in the Arts.Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Optogenetic Memory Modification and the Many Facets of Authenticity.Alexandre Erler - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (1):40-42.
Being True to Works of Music.Julian Dodd - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi.T. C. Kline Iii - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.
Authenticity—the View From Within.Ruud Welten - 2010 - Bijdragen 71 (2):197-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-03

Downloads
82 (#147,346)

6 months
46 (#23,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Suarez
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

General Propositions and Causality.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1929 - In The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner. pp. 237-255.
I: A Lecture on Ethics.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):3-12.
Was He Trying to Whistle It?Peter Ms Hacker - 2000 - In Alice Crary & Rupert J. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge. pp. 353-388.

View all 11 references / Add more references