Nature at the Limits of Science and Phenomenology

Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1 (1):109-133 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant and Heidegger argue that our subjectivity escapes scientific explanation, while also providing the conditions that enable it. This understanding of the relationship between subjectivity and science places limits on the explanatory scope of the sciences. But what makes transcendental reflection on the structure of subjectivity possible in the first place? Fink argues that transcendental philosophy encounters its own limits in attempting to characterize its own conditions of possibility. I argue that the limits of science and transcendental philosophy entail that nature cannot be conceived as a specific object, or as a totality of objects in the world, but only as the ontological ground of phenomenal manifestation in general. Nature is not identical with anything discoverable in either science or phenomenology; it is, rather, the origin from which discovery of phenomena proceeds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Meontic and the Militant: On Merleau-Ponty’s Relation to Fink∗.Bryan Smyth - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):669 - 699.
The Hidden Art of Understanding: Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty's Appropriation of Kant's Theory of Imagination.Samantha Matherne - 2019 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 17:225-245.
A dilemma for Heideggerian cognitive science.David Suarez - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (5):909-930.
The Phenomenological Kant: Heidegger's Interest in Transcendental Philosophy.Chad Engelland - 2010 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2):150-169.
Was Merleau-Ponty a ‘transcendental’ phenomenologist?Andrew Inkpin - 2016 - Continental Philosophy Review 50 (1):27-47.
Remarks on Gallagher’s Enactivist Philosophy of Nature.David Macarthur - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):179-183.
Merleau-Ponty’s Transcendental Project.Marcus Sacrini - 2011 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 3 (2):311-334.
Affect as Transcendental Condition of Activity vs. Passivity, and of Natural Science.David Morris - 2016 - In Jack Reynolds & Ricky Seybold (eds.), Phenomenology and Science. New York, NY, USA: pp. 103-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-02

Downloads
57 (#209,671)

6 months
8 (#105,788)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Suarez
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

References found in this work

Signs.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - Evanston, USA: Northwestern University Press.
Poetry, Language, Thought.Martin Heidegger - 1971 - New York: Harper & Row.
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics.Martin Heidegger - 1962 - Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references