International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (4):437-453 (2017)
AbstractNaturalists seek to ground what exists in a set of fundamental metaphysical principles that they call ‘nature’. But metaphysical principles can’t function as fundamental explanatory grounds, since their ability to explain anything depends on the intelligibility granted by transcendental structures. What makes metaphysical principles intelligible, what unifies them, and allows them to characterize the being of worldly objects are the transcendental structures through which worldly objects are manifest. This means that the search for fundamental explanatory grounds must go deeper than the postulation of brute metaphysical facts. But this search cannot end with transcendental structures either, since the mode of being of transcendental subjects also calls out for explanation. Conceiving of transcendental subjects through the concept of being-in-the-world ties the mode of being of subjects to the world they inhabit. What grounds the existence of worldly objects, and what grounds our existence as being-in-the-world is nature: a principle that is neither an object, nor a subject – a principle that makes possible our encounters with intelligible worldly things.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology in a New Key: Between Analysis and History: Essays in Honor of Richard Cobb-Stevens.Nicolas de Warren & Jeffrey Bloechl (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Springer.
Phenomenology and Naturalism: Examining the Relationship Between Human Experience and Nature.Havi Carel & Darian Meacham (eds.) - 2013 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
How Successful is Naturalism?Michael C. Rea - 2007 - In Georg Gasser (ed.), How Successful is Naturalism? Ontos-Verlag. pp. 105-116.
Phenomenology, Naturalism and Science: A Hybrid and Heretical Proposal.Jack Reynolds - 2017 - New York: Routledge.
Mental Causation in Searle’s “Biological Naturalism”.Jaegwon Kim - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):189-194.
A Renewal of Husserl’s Critique of Naturalism: Towards the Via Media of Ecological Phenomenology.Adam Konopka - 2008 - Environmental Philosophy 5 (1):37-59.
World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism.Michael Cannon Rea - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Introduction - the nature of naturalism.David Macarthur & Mario De Caro - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-20.
Toward a Critical Naturalism: Reflections on Contemporary American Philosophy.Patrick Romanell - 1958 - New York: Macmillan.
Psychologism and Phenomenological Psychology Revisited Part I: The Liberation from Naturalism.Lisa A. Cosgrove & Larry Davidson - 1991 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 22 (2):87-108.
Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative.Jerome Arthur Stone - 2008 - State University of New York Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Nature at the Limits of Science and Phenomenology.David Suarez - 2020 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1 (1):109-133.
Autopoietic Enactivism, Phenomenology, and the Problem of Naturalism: A Neutral Monist Proposal.Andrea Pace Giannotta - 2021 - Husserl Studies 37 (3):209-228.
References found in this work
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1987 - MIT Press.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: The Humanities Press.
Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes.Fred Dretske - 1988 - MIT Press.