- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The nature of scientific thought
Science & Education 4 (1):1-22 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
More on the nature of scientific thought: Responses to Professors Lederman and Ohlsson.W. A. Suchting - 1996 - Science & Education 5 (4):381-390.
Suchting on the nature of scientific thought: Are we anchoring curricula in quicksand?Norman G. Lederman - 1995 - Science & Education 4 (4):371-377.
Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling.Nancy J. Nersessian - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):125-161.
The Aesthetics of Nature.Noel E. Boulting - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3-4):21-34.
The power of thought experiments.George N. Schlesinger - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (4):467-482.
Laws of Nature: do we need a metaphysics?Michel Ghins - 2007 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 11 (2):127-150.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-30
Downloads
23 (#664,515)
6 months
7 (#411,886)
2014-03-30
Downloads
23 (#664,515)
6 months
7 (#411,886)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Nature of Science and Science Education: A Bibliography.Randy Bell, Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, Norman G. Lederman, William F. Mccomas & Michael R. Matthews - 2001 - Science & Education 10 (1):187-204.
Suchting on the nature of scientific thought: Are we anchoring curricula in quicksand?Norman G. Lederman - 1995 - Science & Education 4 (4):371-377.
Philosophical skepticism not relativism is the problem with the Strong Programme in Science Studies and with Educational Constructivism.Dimitris P. Papayannakos - 2008 - Science & Education 17 (6):573-611.
Science as content, science as context: working in the science department.Helen Wildy & John Wallace* - 2004 - Educational Studies 30 (2):99-112.
To appreciate variation between scientists: A perspective for seeing science's vitality.E. David Wong - 2002 - Science Education 86 (3):386-400.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo