Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology


Authors
Michael Sudduth
San Francisco State University
Abstract
In the present paper I address two significant and prevalent errors concerning to natural theology within the Reformed theological tradition. First, contrary to Alvin Plantinga, I argue that the idea of properly basic theistic belief has not motivated or otherwise grounded opposition to natural theology within the Reformed tradition. There is, in fact, a Reformed endorsement of natural theology grounded in the notion that theistic belief can be properly basic. Secondly, I argue that late nineteenth- and twentieth-century Reformed criticisms of natural theology do not constitute an objection to natural theology as such but rather an objection to natural theology construed in a particular way. I explore the nature of this objection and its compatibility with an alternative understanding of natural theology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.340
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

"Signs for a People Who Reason": Religious Experience and Natural Theology.Amber Griffioen - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):139-163.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-01-29

Total views
195 ( #37,539 of 2,266,813 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #13,990 of 2,266,813 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature