Davidson’s Answer to Kripke’s Sceptic


Authors
Claudine Verheggen
York University
Olivia Sultanescu
University of Chicago
Abstract
According to the sceptic Saul Kripke envisages in his celebrated book on Wittgenstein on rules and private language, there are no facts about an individual that determine what she means by any given expression. If there are no such facts, the question then is, what justifies the claim that she does use expressions meaningfully? Kripke’s answer, in a nutshell, is that she by and large uses her expressions in conformity with the linguistic standards of the community she belongs to. While Kripke’s sceptical problem has gripped philosophers for over three decades, few, if any, have been satisfied by his proposed solution, and many have struggled to come up with one of their own. The purpose of this paper is to show that a more satisfactory answer to Kripke’s challenge can be developed on the basis of Donald Davidson’s writings on triangulation, the idea of two individuals interacting simultaneously with each other and the world they share. It follows from the triangulation argument that the facts that can be regarded as determining meaning are irreducible. Yet, contra Kripke, they are not mysterious, for the argument does spell out what is needed for an individual’s expressions to be meaningful.
Keywords meaning  normativity  semantic scepticism  donald davidson  saul kripke
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3487
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,728
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Primitive Normativity and Skepticism About Rules.Hannah Ginsborg - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (5):227-254.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Was Wittgenstein a Sceptic?Oswald Hanfling - 1985 - Philosophical Investigations 8 (January):1-16.
Self-Knowledge and Scepticism.Jeff Malpas - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):165-184.
Davidson's Externalism and Swampman's Troublesome Biography.André Leclerc - 2005 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 9 (1-2):159-175.
Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Paradox: A Trilemma for Davidson.Ali Hossein Khani - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (1):21–37.
The Normativity of Meaning.Alan Millar - 2002 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Philosophical Studies. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57-73.
The Normativity of Meaning.Alan Millar - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51:57-73.
Descriptive Analysis and the Sceptic.Anfinn Stigen - 1961 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 4 (1-4):228 – 269.
Perception and Metaphysical Scepticism.Paul Coates - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):1-28.
Perception and Metaphysical Scepticism.Paul Coates - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes( 72:1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
34 ( #249,644 of 2,264,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #35,819 of 2,264,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature