Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):103-130 (2002)

Authors
Daniel Sulmasy
Georgetown University
Abstract
The word ‘dignity’ arises continuously in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide, both in Europe and in North America. Unlike the phrases ‘autonomy’ and ‘slippery slope’, ‘dignity’ is used by those on both sides of the question. For example, the organizations most prominently associated with the campaign that culminated in the recent legalization of euthanasia in Belgium are the Association pour la Droit de Mourir dans la Dignité and Recht op Waardig Sterven. Yet when Belgium passed its euthanasia law, that nation’s Catholic bishops declared, “All this is opposed to the fundamental respect for human life that lies at the heart of a society based on human dignity”. Or, consider the fact that the legislation that legalized assisted suicide in the state of Oregon, U.S.A., was called the “Death with Dignity Act.” Yet opponents of assisted suicide in the United States, such as the Family Research Council, have declared that, “The idea of assisted suicide is a poison pill that kills the dignity of a precious human life”.Over and above differences in translation, the word ‘dignity’ cannot mean the same thing in all four of the preceding sentences. It cannot be the univocal basis of moral arguments both for and against euthanasia and assisted suicide. A better understanding of this word would therefore help to bring clarity and insight to the arguments about euthanasia and assisted suicide in Europe, North America, and throughout the world
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2143/EP.9.2.503850
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Varieties of Human Dignity: A Logical and Conceptual Analysis.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):937-944.
Death and Dignity in Catholic Christian Thought.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4):537-543.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Death with Dignity.P. Allmark - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):255-257.
Death, Dying, and Dignity.Felicia Ackerman - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:189-201.
Euthanasia - Who Is in Control?Gregory K. Pike - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (2):31.
Human Dignity as a Right.Shaoping Gan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
What is a Death with Dignity?Jyl Gentzler - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):461 – 487.
An Analysis of “Dignity”.Philip R. S. Johnson - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):337-352.
Death, Dignity, and Respect.Samuel J. Kerstein - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):505-530.
Northwest Passages.Courtney S. Campbell - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):66-78.
Human Dignity as a Right.Gan Shaoping & Zhang Lin - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370 - 384.
Undignified Bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
130 ( #67,595 of 2,326,038 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #40,694 of 2,326,038 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes