Feminism and phenomenology: A reply to Silvia Stoller

Hypatia 15 (1):183-188 (2000)

Authors
Shannon Sullivan
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Abstract
: Responding to Silvia Stoller's comments on "Domination and Dialogue in Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception" (Sullivan 1997), I argue that while phenomenology has much to offer feminism, feminists should be wary of Merleau-Ponty's notion of projective intentionality because of the ethical solipsism that it tends to involve. I also take the opportunity to clarify the concept of hypothetical construction introduced in the earlier paper, in particular the transformative relationship that it has to pre-reflective experience
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hyp.2000.0010
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,461
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Educating For and Through Nature: A Merleau-Pontian Approach.Ruyu Hung - 2008 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (5):355-367.
Clinical Evidence and the Absent Body in Medical Phenomenology: On the Need for a New Phenomenology of Medicine.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2010 - Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):43-71.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
154 ( #51,891 of 2,280,297 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #85,993 of 2,280,297 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature