Understanding in mathematical science

Liberal Arts in Russia 6 (1):33-39 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the article, the phenomenon of understanding in mathematics is studied. This topic is relevant in contemporary philosophy of science, in which the classic dichotomy of ‘understanding-explanation‘, characteristic of classical science, undergoes serious transformations. One reason for this transformation is a quantitative increase in the flow of information in modern science. It is clear that in such a situation you want to hold a serious understanding of this information in the context of modern scientific picture of the world. As the modern science is inextricably linked to mathematical science, it is required to rely on the results of studies of the phenomenon of understanding in mathematics. Such studies are already under way in the modern philosophical and scientific literature, although this issue is still relatively new. The author identifies the most important, in his view, types of understanding in math, taking into account the situation of the teaching of mathematics, the situation of mathematical discovery, and ‘mathematical symbolism‘. A study of the main types of understanding in math and the identification of its specificity would have been impossible without the support of the concept of tacit knowledge taken as a methodological tool and author’s previously published works taken as a basis. In this article, the author relies on the classic work on the philosophy of mathematics, as well as the works of famous contemporary Russian and foreign scientists and philosophers. The results of the study are summarized in the form of conclusions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whether philosophers need contemporary mathematics?V. A. Erovenko - 2013 - Liberal Arts in Russia 2 (6):523--530.
Knowledge of Mathematics without Proof.Alexander Paseau - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):775-799.
Philosophy of mathematics.Leon Horsten - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mathematics as a science of patterns.Michael David Resnik - 1997 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Independence and justification in mathematics.Krzysztof Wójtowicz - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):349-373.
Is mathematical competence innate?Robert Schwartz - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):227-40.
Mathematics as a Science of Patterns.Michael D. Resnik - 1997 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Mathematical understanding and the physical sciences.Harry Collins - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (4):667-685.
Is Mathematics a Pure Science?Robin Hirsch - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (1):58 - 79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-25

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references