Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):159-175 (1988)
Animal liberationists tend to divide into two mutually antagonistic camps: animal welfarists, who share a utilitarian moral outlook, and animal rightists, who presuppose a structure of basic rights. However, the gap between these groups tends to be exaggerated by their allegiance to oversimplified versions of their favored moral frameworks. For their part, animal rightists should acknowledge that rights, however basic, are also defeasible by appeals to consequences. Contrariwise, animal welfarists should recognize that rights, however derivative, are capable of constraining appeals to consequences. If both sides move to more defensible theoretical positions, their remaining differences on that level may be compatible with a broad area of convergence on practical issues. Keywords: animal welfare, animal rights, ethics CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Schmidt - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion.John M. Kistler - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights: Comments and Intentions.Georges Chapouthier & Jean-Claude Nouët (eds.) - 1998 - Ligue Française des Droits De L'Animal.
Animal Century: A Celebration of Changing Attitudes to Animals.Mark Gold - 1998 - J. Carpenter.
People Promoting and People Opposing Animal Rights: In Their Own Words.John M. Kistler - 2002 - Greenwood Press.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads42 ( #118,049 of 2,143,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,162 of 2,143,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.