Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70 (2004)

Abstract
An illustrative comparison of human rights in 1948 and the contemporary period, attempting to gauge the impact of globalization on changes in the content of human rights (e.g., collective rights, women's rights, right to a healthy environment), major abusers and guarantors of human rights (e.g., state actors, transnational corporations, social movements), and alternative justifications of human rights (e.g., pragmatic agreement, moral intuitionism, overlapping consensus, cross-cultural dialogue)
Keywords human rights and the environment  women's rights  human rights  globalization  collective rights  human rights justification  human rights abusers and guarantors
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0384-9694.2004.00154.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Comparative Ethics, a Common Morality, and Human Rights.Sumner B. Twiss - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):649-657.
No Space. Nowhere. Refugees and the Problem of Human Rights in Arendt and Ricœur.Hille Haker - 2018 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 8 (2):22-45.
Global Ethics and Human Rights: A Reflection.Sumner B. Twiss - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):204-222.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
155 ( #65,240 of 2,433,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #114,777 of 2,433,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes