The Logikē Latreia of Romans 12: 1 and Its Interpretation Among Christian Humanists

Perichoresis 15 (1):47-66 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scholars have debated whether the sentiment of sixteenth century reformers against material forms of worship derived from certain Neo-Platonic ideas proliferating in parts of Europe and disseminated by Erasmus or from strictly Scriptural principles that were initially formulated by the Old Testament prophets and given fuller expression in the New. This essay studies the reformers′ interpretation of the phrase logikē latreia at Romans 12:1, as well as other key passages. It concludes that, whether consciously or subconsciously, the reformers borrowed language concerning the material-spiritual dichotomy of worship, not directly from Neo-Platonists, but from a commonplace used by numerous Roman writers. Early Church Fathers had long ago turned the same commonplace against pagan rivals, but now the reformers were employing it against the Catholic Church itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preaching Romans Today.Thomas G. Long - 2004 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 58 (3):265-275.
The Dialectic of Monotheism: St. Paul's “Letter to the Romans”.Aryeh Botwinick - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (143):113-132.
Interpreting Romans: The New Perspective and Beyond.Brendan Byrne - 2004 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 58 (3):241-252.
Humanists and Humanists.Calvert Alexander - 1930 - Modern Schoolman 6 (4):66-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-20

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations