Philosophical Studies 155 (2):267-288 (2011)

Authors
Tim Sundell
University of Kentucky
Abstract
I argue for the possibility of substantive aesthetic disagreements in which both parties speak truly. The possibility of such disputes undermines an argument mobilized by relativists such as Lasersohn (Linguist Philos 28:643–686, 2005) and MacFarlane (Philos Stud 132:17–31, 2007) against contextualism about aesthetic terminology. In describing the facts of aesthetic disagreement, I distinguish between the intuition of dispute on the one hand and the felicity of denial on the other. Considered separately, neither of those phenomena requires that there be a single proposition asserted by one party to an aesthetic dispute and denied by the other. I suggest instead that many such disputes be analyzed as disputes over the selection or appropriateness of a contextually salient aesthetic standard
Keywords Philosophy of language  Disagreement  Aesthetics  Relativism  Contextualism  Taste
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,913
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Harvard University Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Laurence Horn - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford University Press UK.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.
Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.
Retractions.Teresa Marques - 2018 - Synthese 195 (8):3335-3359.
Conceptual Ethics II.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1102-1110.

View all 98 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Old Saw “I Know Nothing About Art but I Know What I Like".Kevin Melchionne - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
Aesthetic Essays.Malcolm Budd - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Method of Verbal Dispute.Alan Sidelle - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1/2):83-113.
A New Problem for Aesthetics.Kevin Melchionne - 2011 - Contemporary Aesthetics 9.
Exploring the Relationship Between Humor and Aesthetic Experience. Gordon - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):111-121.
On Preserving Nature’s Aesthetic Features.L. Duane Willard - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):293-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-06-09

Total views
344 ( #22,554 of 2,409,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #56,780 of 2,409,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes