Minority Oppression and Justified Revolution

Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (4):442-453 (2010)
Abstract
This paper operates from the assumption that revolution is a legitimate tool for members of oppressed minority groups to secure their rights. I argue that this type of robust right of revolution cannot be derived from Locke’s justification of revolution in the Second Treatise. For Locke, revolution is justified when the government uses its power in a manner contrary to the principles on which the state was established. Whether or not an action is contrary to these principles is determined by the people as a whole (i.e., the majority). Members of oppressed minority groups, therefore, would be justified in exercising their right of revolution only if they could garner support from a majority of the citizenry. In many instances, satisfying this criterion would require oppressed individuals to receive support from their oppressors—a practical impossibility. Since this requirement is rooted in Locke’s account of the origins of civil society, if it is the case that revolution is a legitimate tool for members of oppressed minority groups to secure their rights, then it would be necessary to look elsewhere for theoretical support to justify a robust right of revolution. I argue that such support can be found in a deontological account of civil society.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01509.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,492
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Second Treatise on Government.John Locke - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Political Philosophy.Jean Hampton - 1997 - Westview Press.
Crime, Minorities, and the Social Contract.Bill Lawson - 1990 - Criminal Justice Ethics 9 (2):16-24.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
On the Choice Between Reform and Revolution.Kai Nielsen - 1971 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):271 – 295.
Group-Specific Rights.Plamen Makariev - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:69-76.
Social Psychology and the Paradox of Revolution.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):228-238.
Locke on Toleration and Inclusion.Lee Ward - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (4):518-540.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
The Reception of Locke's Politics.Mark Goldie (ed.) - 1999 - Pickering & Chatto.
Added to PP index
2010-11-19

Total downloads
55 ( #97,137 of 2,180,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #154,749 of 2,180,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums