A Reply to My Critics: The Critical Spirit of Bourdieusian Language

Social Epistemology 27 (3-4):323-393 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on my article “Bourdieusian reflections on language: Unavoidable conditions of the real speech situation”, this paper provides a detailed response to the above commentaries by Lisa Adkins, Bridget Fowler, Michael Grenfell, David Inglis, Hans-Herbert Kögler, Steph Lawler, William Outhwaite, Derek Robbins and Bryan S. Turner. The main purpose of this “Reply to my critics” is to reflect upon the most important issues raised by these commentators and thereby contribute to a more nuanced understanding of key questions arising from Bourdieu’s analysis of language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language and spirit.D. Z. Phillips & Mario Von der Ruhr (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reply to Our Critics.Marc Jeannerod - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (2):361-368.
Reply to my critics.Bryan Caplan - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):377-413.
A Reply to Our Critics.Steven Knapp & Walter Benn Michaels - 1983 - Critical Inquiry 9 (4):790-800.
What Davidson Should Have Said.Ernest LePore & Barry Loewer - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):65-78.
Reply to Critics.John Gray - 2006 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):323-347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Susen
City University London