From Procedural Rights to Political Economy: New Horizons for Regulating Online Privacy

In Sabine Trepte & Philipp K. Masur (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media. Routledge. pp. 281-290 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The 2010s were a golden age of information privacy research, but its policy accomplishments tell a mixed story. Despite significant progress on the development of privacy theory and compelling demonstrations of the need for privacy in practice, real achievements in privacy law and policy have been, at best, uneven. In this chapter, I outline three broad shifts in the way scholars (and, to some degree, advocates and policy makers) are approaching privacy and social media. First, a change in emphasis from individual to structural approaches. Second, increasing attention to the political economy of privacy—especially the business models of information companies, such as social media platforms. And third, a deeper understanding of privacy’s role in a healthy digital public sphere.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy and the public/private dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Privatheitsrechte und politische Öffentlichkeit.Titus Stahl - 2019 - In Hauke Behrendt, Wulf Loh, Matzner Tobias & Catrin Misselhorn (eds.), Privatsphäre 4.0: Eine Neuverortung des Privaten im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung. Metzler. pp. 123-143.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
The Internet and Privacy.Carissa Veliz - 2019 - In David Edmonds (ed.), Ethics and the Contemporary World. New York: Routledge. pp. 149-159.
Towards an alternative concept of privacy.Christian Fuchs - 2011 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9 (4):220-237.
Privacy Rights and Democracy: A Contradiction in Terms?Annabelle Lever - 2006 - Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):142-162.
Privacy Rights and Democracy: A Contradiction in Terms?Annabelle Lever - 2006 - Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):142-162.


Added to PP

374 (#54,293)

6 months
212 (#12,604)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Susser
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
Privacy, intimacy, and personhood.Jeffrey Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.
Privacy and Freedom.Alan F. Westin - 1970 - Science and Society 34 (3):360-363.

View all 9 references / Add more references