Utilitas 6 (2):287 (1994)

This paper focuses on two works of nineteenth-century feminism: Harriet Taylor's essay, Enfranchisement of Women, and John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women. My aim is to indicate that these texts are more radical than is usually allowed: far from being merely criticisms of the legal disabilities suffered by women in Victorian Britain, they are important moral texts which anticipate central themes within twentieth-century radical feminism. In particular, The Subjection of Women is not merely a liberal defence of legal equality; it is a positive statement of the inadequacy of ‘male” conceptions of reason and its powers. So understood, I shall argue, it coheres with Mill's other moral and political writings, and draws much of its persuasive power from the doctrines advanced in Harriet Taylor's Enfranchisement of Women
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820800001643
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mill and the Subjection of Women.Julia Annas - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (200):179 - 194.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Chief Inducement? The Idea of Marriage as Friendship.Ruth Abbey & Douglas J. Den Uyl - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):37–52.
John Stuart Mill and the Harriet Taylor Myth.H. O. Pappe - 1960 - [Parkville]Melbourne University Press.
John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor.John Stuart Mill - 1951 - London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.


Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #102,365 of 62,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 62,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes